Oppo Reno Ace vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Oppo Reno Ace (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 49/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 859,084); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 8.7mm).
Oppo Reno Ace
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Faster charging: 65W vs 45W
- Overall rating 49/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 859084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1031
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2864
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 22 points higher (71/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (45/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (45/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (76/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno Ace | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1828x2584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10.0; ColorOS 6.1 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.7×8.7 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno Ace
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Oppo Reno Ace
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno Ace
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno Ace and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Oppo Reno Ace by 72.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (45/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (76/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace by 22 points (71/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno Ace and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Oppo Reno Ace has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno Ace over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.