OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo Y200 GT
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo Y200 GT (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 58/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,025,251).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Vivo Y200 GT
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1025251
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2967
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 63/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo Y200 GT, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 28 points higher (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Vivo Y200 GT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 1025251 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 1131 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 2967 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y200 GT
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Vivo Y200 GT by 200.3% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo Y200 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (89/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (94/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (83/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT by 28 points (86/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo Y200 GT?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo Y200 GT — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo Y200 GT?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y200 GT is a better fit for everyday use.