OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo X Fold3

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X Fold3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 73/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,754,213); the Vivo X Fold3 is thinner (4.7mm vs 8.2mm).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold3 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
Vivo X Fold3
Performance 75
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 62
Portability 64
Value for money
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1754213
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 better?

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold3, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 13 points higher (86/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (83/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).

OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X Fold3: The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Reno 16 Pro Vivo X Fold3
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3079298 1754213
Geekbench Single 2680 2004
Geekbench Multi 8358 5311
Display 6.8" AMOLED 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 2200x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 80W 80W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 14, OriginOS 4
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 160.0×142.7×4.7 mm
Weight 219 g
Launch price $661
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Vivo X Fold3
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X Fold3
  • 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2200x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Vivo X Fold3
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
62
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo X Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
73/100 -75.5%
1754213 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Vivo X Fold3 by 75.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Vivo X Fold3
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (83/100 vs 62/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold3 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X Fold3 — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.