OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Tecno Pova Curve
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $661 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 58/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 877,641).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Tecno Pova Curve
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 64/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $661
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 28 points higher (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 64/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (70/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $219 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Tecno Pova Curve by 250.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $442. Tecno Pova Curve was $442 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (89/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (94/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (83/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (70/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 28 points (86/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Tecno Pova Curve?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Tecno Pova Curve?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.