OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Sony Xperia 5 IV

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Sony Xperia 5 IV (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; estimated prices are $661 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 67/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,242,193).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Sony Xperia 5 IV — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Performance 68
Display 84
Camera 56
Battery 66
Portability 74
Value for money 46
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1242193
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 4453
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Cheaper: $661 vs $799

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Sony Xperia 5 IV better?

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Sony Xperia 5 IV, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 19 points higher (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (94/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Sony Xperia 5 IV notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (84/100 vs 46/100).

OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Sony Xperia 5 IV: The Sony Xperia 5 IV is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Reno 16 Pro Sony Xperia 5 IV
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3079298 1242193
Geekbench Single 2680 1675
Geekbench Multi 8358 4453
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.1" OLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1080x2520
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W
Wireless charging 50W
DXOMark (camera) 119
Main camera 200 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 12 MP
Front camera 50 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 12, upgradable to Android 13
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP65
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 156.0×67.0×8.2 mm
Weight 172 g
Price $661 $799
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Sony Xperia 5 IV
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
56
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Sony Xperia 5 IV
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Sony Xperia 5 IV
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
66
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Sony Xperia 5 IV, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
67/100 -147.9%
1242193 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Sony Xperia 5 IV by 147.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Sony Xperia 5 IV
$799

Price difference: $138. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $138.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (89/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (94/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (83/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Sony Xperia 5 IV notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 IV (84/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Sony Xperia 5 IV?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Sony Xperia 5 IV — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Sony Xperia 5 IV?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Sony Xperia 5 IV — 67/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Sony Xperia 5 IV?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Sony Xperia 5 IV?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Sony Xperia 5 IV?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Sony Xperia 5 IV is a better fit for active users.