OPPO Reno 15c vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The OPPO Reno 15c (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $385 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,307,414); the OPPO Reno 15c is noticeably lighter (197g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno 15c

Performance 65
Display 85
Camera 64
Battery 66
Portability 62
Value for money 64

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes OPPO Reno 15c better?

  • Lighter: 197g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $385 vs $950

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1307414
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1270
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4106
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 15c vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 15c — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 15c are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 15c notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).

OPPO Reno 15c: The OPPO Reno 15c is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno 15c Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1307414 4247433
Geekbench Single 1270 3639
Geekbench Multi 4106 11047
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1256x2760 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP69
Dimensions 158.0×74.8×7.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 197 g 230 g
Launch price $385 $950

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno 15c

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno 15c

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1256x2760
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno 15c

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 15c and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 15c Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
67/100
1307414 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +69.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 15c by 69.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno 15c

$385

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $565. OPPO Reno 15c was $565 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c (99/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 15c are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c (96/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c (85/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 15c notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno 15c or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15c by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 15c and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno 15c has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 15c or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 15c or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 15c over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno 15c is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.