Oppo K14 Turbo Pro vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads — 71/100 vs 70/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 8000); the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,037,573 vs 2,708,482).
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Higher AnTuTu: 3037573 vs 2708482
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 213g vs 219g
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (46/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 8000 mAh
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 75/100)
Comparing the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro scores 1 points higher (71/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (89/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100).
| Specification | Oppo K14 Turbo Pro | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 3037573 | 2708482 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 8.3×None×None mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $300 |
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 12.2% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (89/100 vs 87/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 70/100.
Should you choose the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.