Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads — 73/100 vs 63/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5750); the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is faster in AnTuTu (1,540,240 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 249g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5750 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 249g
- Better display (82/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Tecno Phantom V Fold2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1540240 vs 971081
- Better Geekbench Single: 1967 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5401 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 70W vs 45W
- Higher performance (74/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold2, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 scores 10 points higher (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads (74/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (74/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (74/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 971081 | 1540240 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 5401 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5750 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 159.0×140.4×6.1 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 249 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 5750 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Tecno Phantom V Fold2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 37.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (74/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (74/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads on performance (74/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra over the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a better fit for active users.