Oppo K14 Turbo Pro vs Redmi K90 Max
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Redmi K90 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Max leads — 74/100 vs 71/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Max has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 8000); the Redmi K90 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,803,420 vs 3,037,573).
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Redmi K90 Max
- Lighter: 213g vs 227g
- Better portability (46/100 vs 41/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3803420 vs 3037573
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 8358
- Bigger battery: 8550 vs 8000 mAh
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 75/100)
Comparing the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro vs the Redmi K90 Max, the Redmi K90 Max scores 3 points higher (74/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Max and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (78/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Oppo K14 Turbo Pro | Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3037573 | 3803420 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 8550 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP66 | |
| Dimensions | 8.3×None×None mm | 162.9×77.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $504 |
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K90 Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi K90 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90 Max
- 8550 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and Redmi K90 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Max leads Oppo K14 Turbo Pro by 20.1% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Max and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (78/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro or the Redmi K90 Max?
The Redmi K90 Max edges out the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Redmi K90 Max?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Redmi K90 Max — 74/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro or the Redmi K90 Max?
The Redmi K90 Max leads on performance (95/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro over the Redmi K90 Max?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.