OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro

The OPPO Find X9 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 13T Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; launch prices were $1199 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 72/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5000); the OPPO Find X9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,254,273 vs 1,798,756); per DXOMark lab testing, the OPPO Find X9 Pro has the stronger camera (166 vs 131); the Xiaomi 13T Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 217g).

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13T Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X9 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 93
Battery 83
Portability 46
Value for money 84
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Performance 74
Display 93
Camera 66
Battery 64
Portability 54
Value for money 56
What makes OPPO Find X9 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3254273 vs 1798756
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 1917
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10800 vs 4509
  • Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 74/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 66/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Xiaomi 13T Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 200g vs 217g
  • Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1199

  • Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Pro vs the Xiaomi 13T Pro, the OPPO Find X9 Pro scores 15 points higher (87/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (83/100 vs 64/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 Pro — 84/100, Xiaomi 13T Pro — 56/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (93/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (93/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).

OPPO Find X9 Pro: The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 13T Pro: The Xiaomi 13T Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Find X9 Pro Xiaomi 13T Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
AnTuTu 3254273 1798756
Geekbench Single 2900 1917
Geekbench Multi 10800 4509
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2780x1264 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 166 131
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / ColorOS 15.2 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.5×8.3 mm 162.2×75.7×8.5 mm
Weight 217 g 200 g
Launch price $1199 $600
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X9 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera
Xiaomi 13T Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
66
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Find X9 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Xiaomi 13T Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X9 Pro
  • 6200 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 19:04 hrs, total 35:19 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Xiaomi 13T Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9 Pro and Xiaomi 13T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
87/100
3254273 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
72/100 -80.9%
1798756 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9 Pro leads Xiaomi 13T Pro by 80.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Find X9 Pro
$1199
Xiaomi 13T Pro
$600

Launch price difference: $599. Xiaomi 13T Pro was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (93/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (93/100 vs 66/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13T Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Xiaomi 13T Pro — 72/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on camera score (93/100 vs 66/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Pro over the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 13T Pro is a better fit for active users.