Nubia Focus Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Nubia Focus Pro (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 49/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 628,581); the ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 222g).
Nubia Focus Pro
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Better camera (48/100 vs 44/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2186
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 222g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 40/100)
Comparing the Nubia Focus Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 9 points higher (58/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Focus Pro (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Focus Pro (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Focus Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Nubia Focus Pro | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×76.1×8.5 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nubia Focus Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nubia Focus Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Focus Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Focus Pro and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Nubia Focus Pro by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Focus Pro (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Focus Pro (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Focus Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Focus Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Nubia Focus Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nubia Focus Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nubia Focus Pro has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Focus Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Focus Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nubia Focus Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.