OPPO Find X9s Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro

The OPPO Find X9s Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 13T Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; launch prices were $899 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads — 88/100 vs 72/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9s Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Find X9s Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,274,090 vs 1,820,682).

The OPPO Find X9s Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13T Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Find X9s Pro

Performance 94
Display 85
Camera 96
Battery 80
Portability 55
Value for money 88

Xiaomi 13T Pro

Performance 74
Display 93
Camera 66
Battery 64
Portability 54
Value for money 58

What makes OPPO Find X9s Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3274090 vs 1820682
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1917
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4509
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 198g vs 200g

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 74/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 66/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 54/100)

What makes Xiaomi 13T Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $899

  • Better display (93/100 vs 85/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9s Pro vs the Xiaomi 13T Pro, the OPPO Find X9s Pro scores 16 points higher (88/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads (80/100 vs 64/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9s Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 13T Pro — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro and the Xiaomi 13T Pro are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).

OPPO Find X9s Pro: The OPPO Find X9s Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 13T Pro: The Xiaomi 13T Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Find X9s Pro Xiaomi 13T Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
AnTuTu 3274090 1820682
Geekbench Single 3293 1917
Geekbench Multi 10243 4509
Display 6.3" LTPS AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1216x2640 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 120W
DXOMark (camera) — 131
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) — 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 150.3×71.7×8.4 mm 162.2×75.7×8.5 mm
Weight 198 g 200 g
Launch price $899 $600

Camera comparison

OPPO Find X9s Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Xiaomi 13T Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
66
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Find X9s Pro

  • 6.3" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Xiaomi 13T Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Find X9s Pro

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless charging: no data
80
battery

Xiaomi 13T Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9s Pro and Xiaomi 13T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100
3274090 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
72/100 -79.8%
1820682 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9s Pro leads Xiaomi 13T Pro by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Find X9s Pro

$899

Xiaomi 13T Pro

$600

Launch price difference: $299. Xiaomi 13T Pro was $299 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (94/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (96/100 vs 66/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (80/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro and the Xiaomi 13T Pro are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Find X9s Pro or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13T Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9s Pro and the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 13T Pro — 72/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9s Pro or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 66/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9s Pro or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9s Pro over the Xiaomi 13T Pro?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 13T Pro is a better fit for active users.