OnePlus Turbo 6 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The OnePlus Turbo 6 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $330 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 68/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Turbo 6 has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,382,990); the OnePlus Turbo 6 is noticeably lighter (213g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6 by 23 points (91/100 vs 68/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus Turbo 6

Performance 81
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 76
Portability 46
Value for money 72

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes OnePlus Turbo 6 better?

  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 7000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 213g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $330 vs $950

  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2382990
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2072
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6649
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 76/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Turbo 6 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 23 points higher (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 35/100). Value score: OnePlus Turbo 6 — 72/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6 is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6 (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).

OnePlus Turbo 6: The OnePlus Turbo 6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus Turbo 6 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2382990 4247433
Geekbench Single 2072 3639
Geekbench Multi 6649 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2780x1264 3168x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.5×77.5×8.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 213 g 230 g
Launch price $330 $950

Camera comparison

OnePlus Turbo 6

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus Turbo 6

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus Turbo 6

  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
76
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Turbo 6 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Turbo 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
68/100
2382990 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +43.9%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads OnePlus Turbo 6 by 43.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OnePlus Turbo 6

$330

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $620. OnePlus Turbo 6 was $620 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6 (99/100 vs 81/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6 is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6 (96/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus Turbo 6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6 by 23 points (91/100 vs 68/100).

What is the rating of the OnePlus Turbo 6 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OnePlus Turbo 6 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Turbo 6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Turbo 6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 81/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Turbo 6 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OnePlus Turbo 6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.