OnePlus Nord CE5 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The OnePlus Nord CE5 (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Apex, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $295 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Nord CE5 has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,696,968); the OnePlus Nord CE5 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus Nord CE5

Performance 70
Display 79
Camera 35
Battery 68
Portability 57
Value for money 62

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes OnePlus Nord CE5 better?

  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 7000 mAh
  • Lighter: 199g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $295 vs $950

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1696968
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4313
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Nord CE5 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OnePlus Nord CE5 — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Nord CE5 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

OnePlus Nord CE5: The OnePlus Nord CE5 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus Nord CE5 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Dimensity 8350 Apex Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1696968 4247433
Geekbench Single 1398 3639
Geekbench Multi 4313 11047
Display 6.8" Fluid AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2392 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7100 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1430 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP69
Dimensions 163.6×76.0×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g 230 g
Launch price $295 $950

Camera comparison

OnePlus Nord CE5

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus Nord CE5

  • 6.8" Fluid AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus Nord CE5

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Nord CE5 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Nord CE5 Dimensity 8350 Apex
61/100
1696968 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +60.0%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads OnePlus Nord CE5 by 60.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OnePlus Nord CE5

$295

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $655. OnePlus Nord CE5 was $655 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 (99/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 (96/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 (85/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Nord CE5 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus Nord CE5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE5 by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the OnePlus Nord CE5 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OnePlus Nord CE5 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Nord CE5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Nord CE5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Nord CE5 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OnePlus Nord CE5 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.