Nubia Z60 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nubia Z60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $599 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 75/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,527,231).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nubia Z60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nubia Z60 Ultra

Performance 83
Display 80
Camera 78
Battery 63
Portability 35
Value for money 64

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Nubia Z60 Ultra better?

  • Lighter: 226g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $950

  • Overall rating 75/100

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2527231
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nubia Z60 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 16 points higher (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Nubia Z60 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Z60 Ultra (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Z60 Ultra (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Z60 Ultra (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nubia Z60 Ultra are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).

Nubia Z60 Ultra: The Nubia Z60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nubia Z60 Ultra Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2527231 4247433
Geekbench Single 2203 3639
Geekbench Multi 6511 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2480x1116 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 164.0×76.4×8.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 226 g 230 g
Launch price $599 $950

Camera comparison

Nubia Z60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.59
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 12MP
78
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Nubia Z60 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x1116
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Nubia Z60 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
63
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nubia Z60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
75/100
2527231 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +40.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nubia Z60 Ultra by 40.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nubia Z60 Ultra

$599

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $351. Nubia Z60 Ultra was $351 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Z60 Ultra (99/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Z60 Ultra (96/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Z60 Ultra (85/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nubia Z60 Ultra are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nubia Z60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nubia Z60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Nubia Z60 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nubia Z60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nubia Z60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nubia Z60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Nubia Z60 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nubia Z60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.