Nubia Red Magic 3s vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nubia Red Magic 3s (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 47/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 859,084); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nubia Red Magic 3s doesn't; the Nubia Red Magic 3s is noticeably lighter (215g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Red Magic 3s
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nubia Red Magic 3s better?
- Lighter: 215g vs 230g
- Overall rating 47/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 859084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1031
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2864
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Red Magic 3s vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 44 points higher (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Red Magic 3s | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); Redmagic 2.0 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.7×78.5×9.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nubia Red Magic 3s
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nubia Red Magic 3s
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Red Magic 3s
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Red Magic 3s and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nubia Red Magic 3s by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nubia Red Magic 3s
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (89/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Red Magic 3s or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 3s by 44 points (91/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Red Magic 3s and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nubia Red Magic 3s has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Red Magic 3s or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Red Magic 3s or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Red Magic 3s over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.