Nubia Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nubia Flip (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 49/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4310); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 859,516); the Nubia Flip is noticeably lighter (214g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Flip
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Nubia Flip better?
- Lighter: 214g vs 309g
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 859516
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1044
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2785
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4310 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Flip vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 20 points higher (69/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Flip (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia Flip is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Flip (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Flip (63/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (61/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Flip | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 859516 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1044 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2785 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1188x2790 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4310 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 170.0×75.5×7.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Nubia Flip
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Nubia Flip
- 6.9" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1188x2790
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Flip
- 4310 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Flip and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nubia Flip by 70.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nubia Flip
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Flip (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Flip is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Flip (52/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Flip (63/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (61/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Flip by 20 points (69/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Flip and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Flip has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Flip over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.