Nothing Phone (3a) vs Poco F8 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $329 and $729. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 60/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,651,476 vs 1,050,601); the Nothing Phone (3a) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 218g).

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (3a)

Performance 60
Display 79
Camera 61
Battery 48
Portability 54
Value for money 56

Poco F8 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 90
Camera 90
Battery 85
Portability 49
Value for money 92

What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?

  • Lighter: 201g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $729

  • Better portability (54/100 vs 49/100)

What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3651476 vs 1050601
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1161
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3390
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) vs the Poco F8 Ultra, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 29 points higher (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) — 56/100, Poco F8 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (97/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (85/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (54/100 vs 49/100).

Nothing Phone (3a): The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.
Poco F8 Ultra: The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (3a) Poco F8 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1050601 3651476
Geekbench Single 1161 3639
Geekbench Multi 3390 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2392x1080 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm
Weight 201 g 218 g
Launch price $329 $729

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (3a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Poco F8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (3a)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Poco F8 Ultra

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (3a)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Poco F8 Ultra

  • 6500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (3a) and Poco F8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
60/100
1050601 AnTuTu
Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +71.2%
3651476 AnTuTu

Poco F8 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 71.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (3a)

$329

Poco F8 Ultra

$729

Launch price difference: $400. Nothing Phone (3a) was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (97/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (90/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (85/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (54/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3a) has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Poco F8 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) over the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users. The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.