Nothing Phone (2a) vs Poco F8 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro, while the Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $729. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 59/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,640,351 vs 985,261); the Nothing Phone (2a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 218g).

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (2a)
Performance 58
Display 80
Camera 57
Battery 48
Portability 59
Value for money 58
Poco F8 Ultra
Performance 97
Display 90
Camera 90
Battery 85
Portability 49
Value for money 90
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $729

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3640351 vs 985261
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1100
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3000
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (2a) vs the Poco F8 Ultra, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 30 points higher (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (2a) — 58/100, Poco F8 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (97/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (85/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) is a bit better (59/100 vs 49/100).

Nothing Phone (2a): The Nothing Phone (2a) is a better fit for everyday use.
Poco F8 Ultra: The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (2a) Poco F8 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 985261 3640351
Geekbench Single 1100 3640
Geekbench Multi 3000 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1084 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm
Weight 190 g 218 g
Launch price $349 $729
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (2a)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Poco F8 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (2a)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1084
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Poco F8 Ultra
  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (2a)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Poco F8 Ultra
  • 6500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (2a) and Poco F8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro
59/100
985261 AnTuTu
Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +72.9%
3640351 AnTuTu

Poco F8 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 72.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nothing Phone (2a)
$349
Poco F8 Ultra
$729

Launch price difference: $380. Nothing Phone (2a) was $380 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (97/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (90/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (85/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) is a bit better (59/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (2a) has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Poco F8 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2a) over the Poco F8 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (2a) is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.