Nokia XR30 vs ZTE Blade A76 4G

A full comparison of the Nokia XR30 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A76 4G to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.

Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Performance 46
Display 66
Camera 43
Battery 37
Portability
Value for money
ZTE Blade A76 4G
Performance
Display 43
Camera 31
Battery 43
Portability
Value for money
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 5W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
What makes ZTE Blade A76 4G better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
Comparison verdict

Nokia XR30:
ZTE Blade A76 4G:
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia XR30 ZTE Blade A76 4G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
AnTuTu 592015
Geekbench Single 905
Geekbench Multi 2003
Display 6.7" 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 720x1612
Refresh rate 90 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 5W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 16 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB
Storage 128GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 13 Android 15
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 IP54
Weight
Launch price
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
ZTE Blade A76 4G
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: —
31
camera
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
66
display
ZTE Blade A76 4G
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
ZTE Blade A76 4G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Benchmarks