Nokia XR30 vs Vivo Y11s
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Vivo Y11s (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 25/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y11s has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia XR30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 251,428); the Nokia XR30 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y11s doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Vivo Y11s
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 251428
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 272
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2101 vs 992
- Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y11s better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Vivo Y11s, the Nokia XR30 scores 21 points higher (46/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (46/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Vivo Y11s (46/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Vivo Y11s (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y11s (43/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y11s is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Vivo Y11s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 251428 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 272 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 992 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.4×76.3×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | — | 191 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y11s
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y11s
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y11s
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia XR30 and Vivo Y11s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia XR30 leads Vivo Y11s by 135.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Vivo Y11s (46/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Vivo Y11s (66/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y11s (43/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y11s is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Vivo Y11s?
The Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y11s by 21 points (46/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Vivo Y11s?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo Y11s — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Vivo Y11s?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Vivo Y11s?
The Nokia XR30 leads on performance (46/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Vivo Y11s?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Nokia XR30 (43/100 vs 10/100).