Nokia XR30 vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 48/100 vs 46/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 592,015).
Nokia XR30
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1963
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 33/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 905
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 2 points higher (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (52/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $130 |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Nokia XR30 and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Nokia XR30 by 2.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia XR30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (52/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 edges out the Nokia XR30 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.