Nokia G400 vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 48/100 vs 43/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 477,542); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is thinner (7.5mm vs 8.8mm).
Nokia G400
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Overall rating 43/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 1816
- Faster charging: 25W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 198g
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (69/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 5 points higher (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (47/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 33/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (69/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $130 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Nokia G400 by 21.3% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (47/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 33/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (69/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 edges out the Nokia G400 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 leads on performance (47/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.