Nokia XR30 vs Samsung Galaxy A50
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Samsung Galaxy A50 (2019) runs on the Exynos 9610. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 31/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia XR30 has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 25 MP; the Nokia XR30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 352,871).
Nokia XR30
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 352871
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 370
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1021
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 25MP
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 22/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 51/100)
- Overall rating 31/100
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Samsung Galaxy A50, the Nokia XR30 scores 15 points higher (46/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (46/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (37/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (46/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (37/100 vs 25/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Exynos 9610 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 352871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 370 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1021 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 25 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 25 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 158.5×74.7×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 166 g | |
| Launch price | — | $350 |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Main: 25MP
- Front: 25MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia XR30 and Samsung Galaxy A50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia XR30 leads Samsung Galaxy A50 by 67.8% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia XR30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (46/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (66/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (43/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (37/100 vs 25/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Nokia XR30 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A50 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy A50 — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 22/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Nokia XR30 leads on performance (46/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a better fit for everyday use.