Nokia G400 vs ZTE Blade A73
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the ZTE Blade A73 (2023) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 34/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 330,006).
Nokia G400
ZTE Blade A73
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 20W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 44/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 190g vs 198g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the ZTE Blade A73, the Nokia G400 scores 9 points higher (43/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A73 (66/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the ZTE Blade A73 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A73 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | ZTE Blade A73 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 165.0×76.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A73
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A73
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A73
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and ZTE Blade A73, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads ZTE Blade A73 by 44.7% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A73 (66/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the ZTE Blade A73 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A73 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the ZTE Blade A73?
The Nokia G400 edges out the ZTE Blade A73 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the ZTE Blade A73?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the ZTE Blade A73 — 34/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the ZTE Blade A73?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the ZTE Blade A73?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A73 is a better fit for everyday use.