Nokia G400 vs ZTE Axon 60 Lite
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the ZTE Axon 60 Lite (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 32/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 333,647); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G400
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
What makes Nokia G400 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 333647
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 20W vs 5W
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 44/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 60 Lite better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Overall rating 32/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the ZTE Axon 60 Lite, the Nokia G400 scores 11 points higher (43/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Lite (66/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the ZTE Axon 60 Lite are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G400 | ZTE Axon 60 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 333647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 164.2×75.3×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
- 6.6"
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G400 and ZTE Axon 60 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads ZTE Axon 60 Lite by 43.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Lite (66/100 vs 34/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the ZTE Axon 60 Lite are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The Nokia G400 is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Lite — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite — 32/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Nokia G400 (66/100 vs 34/100).