Nokia G310 vs ZTE Blade A72s

The Nokia G310 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the ZTE Blade A72s (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G310 leads — 39/100 vs 34/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G310 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 333,647).

The Nokia G310 edges out the ZTE Blade A72s by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nokia G310

Performance 41
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 56
Value for money —

ZTE Blade A72s

Performance 27
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 54
Value for money —

What makes Nokia G310 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 333647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1335
  • Faster charging: 20W vs 5W
  • Lighter: 195g vs 198g

  • Higher performance (41/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better display (44/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (56/100 vs 54/100)

What makes ZTE Blade A72s better?


  • Overall rating 34/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia G310 vs the ZTE Blade A72s, the Nokia G310 scores 5 points higher (39/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G310 and the ZTE Blade A72s are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Nokia G310 and the ZTE Blade A72s are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Nokia G310 ZTE Blade A72s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G Unisoc T606
AnTuTu 477542 333647
Geekbench Single 746 378
Geekbench Multi 1816 1335
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1612 720x1600
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 20W 5W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 4GB 3GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 13 Android 12
NFC no no
Dimensions 165.1×75.7×8.6 mm 168.0×77.5×8.6 mm
Weight 195 g 198 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Nokia G310

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

ZTE Blade A72s

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 5MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Nokia G310

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

ZTE Blade A72s

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Battery and charging

Nokia G310

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

ZTE Blade A72s

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nokia G310 and ZTE Blade A72s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia G310 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
39/100
477542 AnTuTu
ZTE Blade A72s Unisoc T606
34/100 -43.1%
333647 AnTuTu

Nokia G310 leads ZTE Blade A72s by 43.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nokia G310 and the ZTE Blade A72s are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia G310 and the ZTE Blade A72s are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nokia G310 or the ZTE Blade A72s?

The Nokia G310 edges out the ZTE Blade A72s by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia G310 and the ZTE Blade A72s?

The Nokia G310 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE Blade A72s — 34/100.

Which is more powerful: the Nokia G310 or the ZTE Blade A72s?

The Nokia G310 leads on performance (41/100 vs 27/100).

Should you choose the Nokia G310 over the ZTE Blade A72s?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Nokia G310 (41/100 vs 27/100).