Nokia 2.3 vs Redmi 6A
The Nokia 2.3 (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Redmi 6A (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia 2.3 leads — 20/100 vs 17/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia 2.3 has the bigger battery (4000 mAh vs 3000); the Redmi 6A is noticeably lighter (145g vs 183g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 2.3
Redmi 6A
What makes Nokia 2.3 better?
- Bigger battery: 4000 vs 3000 mAh
- Longer battery life (32/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi 6A better?
- Lighter: 145g vs 183g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 2.3 vs the Redmi 6A, the Nokia 2.3 scores 3 points higher (20/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia 2.3 leads (32/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia 2.3 is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Nokia 2.3 notably outperforms the Redmi 6A (32/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 6A notably outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (80/100 vs 61/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 2.3 | Redmi 6A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 155362 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 300 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 486 | |
| Display | 6.2" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1520 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10; Android One | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 157.7×75.4×8.7 mm | 147.5×71.5×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 183 g | 145 g | |
| Launch price | — | $90 |
Camera comparison
Nokia 2.3
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Redmi 6A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Nokia 2.3
- 6.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi 6A
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia 2.3
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Redmi 6A
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 2.3 and Redmi 6A, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 2.3
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia 2.3 is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia 2.3 notably outperforms the Redmi 6A (32/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 6A notably outperforms the Nokia 2.3 (80/100 vs 61/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 2.3 or the Redmi 6A?
The Nokia 2.3 edges out the Redmi 6A by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2.3 and the Redmi 6A?
The Nokia 2.3 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Redmi 6A — 17/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 2.3 over the Redmi 6A?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Redmi 6A (80/100 vs 61/100).