Nokia C32 vs ZTE Blade A35
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1. Both devices score the same overall rating of 16/100. Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP.
Nokia C32
ZTE Blade A35
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
The Nokia C32 and the ZTE Blade A35 received the same MobileRank rating — 16/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia C32 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia C32 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Blade A35 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C32 | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | Unisoc SC9863A1 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 846 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia C32 and ZTE Blade A35, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia C32 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Blade A35 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the ZTE Blade A35?
Both devices scored 16/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZTE Blade A35.
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia C32 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.