Nokia 2780 Flip vs ZTE Blade A35
The Nokia 2780 Flip (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A35 leads — 16/100 vs 10/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A35 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 8 MP; the ZTE Blade A35 is thinner (8.5mm vs 11.5mm).
Nokia 2780 Flip
ZTE Blade A35
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 8MP vs 5MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2780 Flip vs the ZTE Blade A35, the ZTE Blade A35 scores 6 points higher (16/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A35 leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia 2780 Flip | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 | Unisoc SC9863A1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 2.7" TFT LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 2 MP | |
| RAM | — | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | — | 64GB | |
| OS | KaiOS 3.1 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 131 g | — | |
| Price | $90 | — |
Nokia 2780 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Nokia 2780 Flip
- 2.7" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 2780 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A35
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (100/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 2780 Flip or the ZTE Blade A35?
The ZTE Blade A35 edges out the Nokia 2780 Flip by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2780 Flip and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia 2780 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 16/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 2780 Flip over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia 2780 Flip is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.