Nokia 2760 Flip vs ZTE Blade A35
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip (2022) and the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A35 leads — 16/100 vs 5/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A35 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 8 MP; the ZTE Blade A35 is thinner (8.5mm vs 11.5mm).
Nokia 2760 Flip
ZTE Blade A35
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 8MP vs 5MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip vs the ZTE Blade A35, the ZTE Blade A35 scores 11 points higher (16/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A35 leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 2760 Flip | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc SC9863A1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 2.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 2 MP | |
| RAM | — | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | — | 64GB | |
| OS | Kai OS | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 2760 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 2.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A35 significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the ZTE Blade A35?
The ZTE Blade A35 is noticeably better than the Nokia 2760 Flip — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2760 Flip and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia 2760 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 16/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 2760 Flip over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Nokia 2760 Flip is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.