Nokia C21 vs Vivo S16e
The Nokia C21 (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo S16e (2022) runs on the Exynos 1080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16e leads — 30/100 vs 5/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S16e has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S16e has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C21 doesn't; the Vivo S16e is thinner (7.7mm vs 8.8mm).
Nokia C21
Vivo S16e
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 187g vs 195g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (66/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Nokia C21 vs the Vivo S16e, the Vivo S16e scores 25 points higher (30/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16e leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C21 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Nokia C21 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C21 (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S16e is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C21 | Vivo S16e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Exynos 1080 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 66W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 169.9×77.9×8.8 mm | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 187 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C21
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C21
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C21
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C21 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Nokia C21 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C21 (37/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S16e is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C21 or the Vivo S16e?
The Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C21 by 25 points (30/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C21 and the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia C21 has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Vivo S16e — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C21 or the Vivo S16e?
The Vivo S16e leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C21 over the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia C21 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use.