Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs Vivo S16e
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (2022) and the Vivo S16e (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16e leads — 30/100 vs 6/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S16e has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 2400); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S16e has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition doesn't; the Vivo S16e is thinner (7.7mm vs 10.0mm).
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
Vivo S16e
- Lighter: 180g vs 187g
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 66/100)
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 2400 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs the Vivo S16e, the Vivo S16e scores 24 points higher (30/100 vs 6/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16e leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C2 2nd Edition | Vivo S16e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Exynos 1080 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 480x960 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 2400 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 66W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 1GB / 2GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 154.0×75.9×10.0 mm | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 187 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x960
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 2400 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (37/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C2 2nd Edition or the Vivo S16e?
The Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition by 24 points (30/100 vs 6/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 2nd Edition and the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition has a MobileRank rating of 6/100, the Vivo S16e — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C2 2nd Edition or the Vivo S16e?
The Vivo S16e leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C2 2nd Edition over the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use.