Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Vivo S16e
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Vivo S16e (2022) runs on the Exynos 1080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16e leads — 30/100 vs 18/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S16e has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S16e is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Vivo S16e
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (45/100 vs 27/100)
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (66/100 vs 12/100)
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Vivo S16e, the Vivo S16e scores 12 points higher (30/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (45/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Vivo S16e (45/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (66/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | Vivo S16e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Exynos 1080 | |
| AnTuTu | 597974 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 799 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | — | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 187 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 24MP
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Vivo S16e (45/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S16e is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (66/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Vivo S16e?
The Vivo S16e is noticeably better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo S16e — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Vivo S16e?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use.