Nokia C2 Tennen vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C2 Tennen (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 17/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 155,362).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C2 Tennen
Vivo Y32t
What makes Nokia C2 Tennen better?
- Better display (42/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 180g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 12/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C2 Tennen vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 11 points higher (28/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia C2 Tennen and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (52/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C2 Tennen | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 779 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 150.6×72.4×9.1 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia C2 Tennen
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia C2 Tennen
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia C2 Tennen
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C2 Tennen and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Nokia C2 Tennen by 48.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia C2 Tennen and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (52/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t is noticeably better than the Nokia C2 Tennen — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 Tennen and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C2 Tennen has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C2 Tennen over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 12/100).