Nokia C12 Pro vs Vivo X300s
The Nokia C12 Pro (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 25/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C12 Pro
Vivo X300s
What makes Nokia C12 Pro better?
- Overall rating 25/100
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C12 Pro vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 64 points higher (89/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (94/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (83/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Nokia C12 Pro are nearly equal (42/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C12 Pro | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C12 Pro
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Nokia C12 Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C12 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C12 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (94/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (94/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (83/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Nokia C12 Pro are nearly equal (42/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro by 64 points (89/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 Pro and the Vivo X300s?
The Nokia C12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C12 Pro over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.