Nokia C12 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia C12 Pro (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 25/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C12 Pro doesn't.
Nokia C12 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
- Overall rating 25/100
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Nokia C12 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 62 points higher (87/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (84/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Nokia C12 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia C12 Pro
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C12 Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C12 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Nokia C12 Pro
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (84/100 vs 40/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro (81/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 Pro by 62 points (87/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C12 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C12 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.