Nokia 2780 Flip vs Realme C65 4G
The Nokia 2780 Flip (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, while the Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; estimated prices are $90 and $125. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme C65 4G leads — 27/100 vs 10/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Realme C65 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme C65 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia 2780 Flip doesn't; the Nokia 2780 Flip is noticeably lighter (131g vs 185g).
Nokia 2780 Flip
Realme C65 4G
- Lighter: 131g vs 185g
- Cheaper: $90 vs $125
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 68/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2780 Flip vs the Realme C65 4G, the Realme C65 4G scores 17 points higher (27/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the Realme C65 4G (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Nokia 2780 Flip | Realme C65 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1364 | |
| Display | 2.7" TFT LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 720x1604 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP | |
| RAM | — | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | — | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | KaiOS 3.1 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 625 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 131 g | 185 g | |
| Price | $90 | $125 |
Nokia 2780 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 2780 Flip
- 2.7" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 2780 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $35. Nokia 2780 Flip is cheaper by $35.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (42/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the Realme C65 4G (100/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 2780 Flip or the Realme C65 4G?
The Realme C65 4G is noticeably better than the Nokia 2780 Flip — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2780 Flip and the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia 2780 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Realme C65 4G — 27/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2780 Flip or the Realme C65 4G?
The Realme C65 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2780 Flip over the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia 2780 Flip is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.