Nokia 2760 Flip vs Realme C65 4G
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip (2022) and the Realme C65 4G (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme C65 4G leads — 27/100 vs 5/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Realme C65 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme C65 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia 2760 Flip doesn't; the Realme C65 4G is thinner (7.6mm vs 11.5mm).
Nokia 2760 Flip
Realme C65 4G
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip vs the Realme C65 4G, the Realme C65 4G scores 22 points higher (27/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia 2760 Flip | Realme C65 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1364 | |
| Display | 2.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 720x1604 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP | |
| RAM | — | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | — | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Kai OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 625 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 185 g | |
| Price | — | $125 |
Nokia 2760 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 2.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Nokia 2760 Flip
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (42/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (68/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Realme C65 4G?
The Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip by 22 points (27/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 2760 Flip and the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia 2760 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Realme C65 4G — 27/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Realme C65 4G?
The Realme C65 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2760 Flip over the Realme C65 4G?
The Nokia 2760 Flip is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.