Nokia 2.4 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Nokia 2.4 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 9/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia 2.4 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Nokia 2.4
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Overall rating 9/100
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 194g vs 195g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2.4 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 20 points higher (29/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (57/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 2.4 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 156818 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.9×76.3×8.7 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 2.4
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 2.4
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 2.4
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (39/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (57/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 by 20 points (29/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 2.4 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Nokia 2.4 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2.4 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Nokia 2.4 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.