Nokia 2.4 vs Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
The Nokia 2.4 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads — 31/100 vs 9/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP.
Nokia 2.4
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Overall rating 9/100
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 194g vs 195g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2.4 vs the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China), the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) scores 22 points higher (31/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (57/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 2.4 | Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 156818 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 650 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.9×76.3×8.7 mm | 164.0×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 2.4
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 2.4
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 2.4
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (34/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) notably outperforms the Nokia 2.4 (39/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and the Nokia 2.4 are nearly equal (57/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.4 by 22 points (31/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 2.4 and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Nokia 2.4 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2.4 or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads on camera score (34/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2.4 over the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Nokia 2.4 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.