Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Tecno Spark 40
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Spark 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81; launch prices were $1499 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 39/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 40 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 358,608).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Tecno Spark 40
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Tecno Spark 40 better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $1499
- Overall rating 39/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Tecno Spark 40, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 39 points higher (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Tecno Spark 40 — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Tecno Spark 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 1416 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 165.6×77.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $120 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Spark 40
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Spark 40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Spark 40
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Tecno Spark 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Tecno Spark 40 by 842.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1379. Tecno Spark 40 was $1379 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (92/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (95/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (60/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Spark 40?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 by 39 points (78/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Spark 40?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Spark 40 — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Spark 40?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Spark 40?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Tecno Spark 40?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.