Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo Y200 GT
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y200 GT (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 35/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y200 GT has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,025,251); the Vivo Y200 GT is noticeably lighter (194g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo Y200 GT
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1025251
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2967
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 5/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 27/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 194g vs 285g
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo Y200 GT, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 42 points higher (77/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y200 GT leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (92/100 vs 5/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y200 GT significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (57/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y200 GT significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo Y200 GT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 1025251 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1131 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2967 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 194 g | |
| Price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y200 GT
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo Y200 GT, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo Y200 GT by 284.6% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo Y200 GT
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (92/100 vs 5/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (91/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y200 GT significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (57/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y200 GT significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT by 42 points (77/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo Y200 GT — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 5/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo Y200 GT is a better fit for everyday use.