Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Vivo Y200 GT

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7030, while the Vivo Y200 GT (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads — 38/100 vs 35/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y200 GT has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is noticeably lighter (170g vs 194g).

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo edges out the Vivo Y200 GT by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 44
Battery 48
Design 87
Value for money 88
Vivo Y200 GT
Performance 5
Display 100
Camera 27
Battery 60
Design 57
Value for money 55
What makes Motorola Edge 40 Neo better?
  • Lighter: 170g vs 194g

  • Better camera (44/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better value for money (88/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y200 GT better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W

  • Higher performance (5/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (60/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs the Vivo Y200 GT, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo scores 3 points higher (38/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (44/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT leads (60/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (88/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (44/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (60/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (88/100 vs 55/100).

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo Y200 GT: The Vivo Y200 GT is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Edge 40 Neo Vivo Y200 GT
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7030 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
AnTuTu 1025251
Geekbench Single 1131
Geekbench Multi 2967
Display 6.5" P-OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1260x2800
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
DXOMark (camera) 103
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades Android 14, OriginOS 4
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 159.6×72.0×7.9 mm 163.7×75.9×8.0 mm
Weight 170 g 194 g
Price $316
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
44
camera
Vivo Y200 GT
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
27
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • 6.5" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y200 GT
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Vivo Y200 GT
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
$316
Vivo Y200 GT
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (44/100 vs 27/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (60/100 vs 48/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (87/100 vs 57/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (88/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Vivo Y200 GT?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo edges out the Vivo Y200 GT by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the Vivo Y200 GT?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo Y200 GT — 35/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Vivo Y200 GT?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads on camera score (44/100 vs 27/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Vivo Y200 GT?

The Vivo Y200 GT leads on performance (5/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 40 Neo over the Vivo Y200 GT?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y200 GT is a better fit for everyday use.