Motorola Razr Fold vs Tecno Pova Slim
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400; launch prices were $1799 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 52/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Tecno Pova Slim
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $1799
- Better display (93/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Tecno Pova Slim, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 31 points higher (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (90/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (100/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Tecno Pova Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 581041 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 803 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 2047 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 156 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $230 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Tecno Pova Slim, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Tecno Pova Slim by 426.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1569. Tecno Pova Slim was $1569 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (90/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (91/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (68/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (100/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 31 points (83/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Tecno Pova Slim — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.