Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Pova Slim
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400; launch prices were $1099 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 52/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Tecno Pova Slim
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 93/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 156g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $1099
- Better portability (100/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Pova Slim, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 24 points higher (76/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (91/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Pova Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 581041 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 803 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2047 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 156 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $230 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Pova Slim, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Slim by 409.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $869. Tecno Pova Slim was $869 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (91/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (57/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 24 points (76/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Pova Slim — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.