Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Pova Slim

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 52/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 550,018); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 24 points (76/100 vs 52/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
Tecno Pova Slim
Performance 44
Display 93
Camera 31
Battery 51
Portability 100
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 550018
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 803
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (57/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 93/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4700 mAh
  • Lighter: 156g vs 199g

  • Better portability (100/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Pova Slim, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 24 points higher (76/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Tecno Pova Slim: The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Tecno Pova Slim
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 6400
AnTuTu 3113462 550018
Geekbench Single 3041 803
Geekbench Multi 9494 2047
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1224x2720
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5160 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15, HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP64
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm
Weight 199 g 156 g
Launch price $1099
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Tecno Pova Slim
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Tecno Pova Slim
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Tecno Pova Slim
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Pova Slim, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Slim MediaTek Dimensity 6400
52/100 -466.1%
550018 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Slim by 466.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
Tecno Pova Slim
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (92/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (57/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 24 points (76/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Pova Slim — 52/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use.