Motorola Razr Flex vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Motorola Razr Flex (2026) runs on the Qualcomm -AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 62/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Flex is thinner (5.8mm vs 8.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Flex
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Motorola Razr Flex better?
- Lighter: 215g vs 223g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 92/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Flex vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 27 points higher (89/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Flex (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Flex (90/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Flex notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (66/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Flex | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm -AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1728x2364 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP49 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 110.0×149.0×5.8 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Flex
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Flex
- 6.9" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1728x2364
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Flex
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr Flex
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Flex (78/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Flex (90/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Flex notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (66/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Flex or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Flex by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Flex and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Motorola Razr Flex has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Flex or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Flex over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.