Motorola Razr 70 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Motorola Razr 70 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $699 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 60/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 4800); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 953,150); the Motorola Razr 70 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 by 27 points (87/100 vs 60/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 70

Performance 57
Display 81
Camera 57
Battery 49
Portability 74
Value for money 34

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Razr 70 better?

  • Lighter: 188g vs 224g
  • Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $892

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 49/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 27 points higher (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 — 34/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (98/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (83/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (74/100 vs 42/100).

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 70 Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400X Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 953150 3950082
Geekbench Single 1061 3639
Geekbench Multi 3185 11047
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 188 g 224 g
Launch price $699 $892

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 70

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 70

  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 70

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
49
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
60/100
953150 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +75.9%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Motorola Razr 70 by 75.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 70

$699

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Launch price difference: $193. Motorola Razr 70 was $193 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (98/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (87/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (83/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (74/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 by 27 points (87/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Motorola Razr 70 has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.