Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 64/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,154,662).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 51
Design 51
Value for money 34
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Performance 70
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 77
Design 37
Value for money 82
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3154662
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9300
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 210g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (58/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
  • Cheaper: $400 vs $1099

  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (82/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 9 points higher (73/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (82/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (58/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (82/100 vs 34/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3942923 3154662
Geekbench Single 3640 3050
Geekbench Multi 11033 9300
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1440x3168
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 68W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g 210 g
Price $1099 $400
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
58
camera
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
77
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
64/100 -25.0%
3154662 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Neo 11 by 25.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
$400

Price difference: $699. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is cheaper by $699.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (92/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (58/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (77/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (82/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.