Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 21/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4030); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 177,554); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) doesn't; the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) is noticeably lighter (163g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4030 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) better?
- Lighter: 163g vs 199g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek), the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 55 points higher (76/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (58/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 723 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.2" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 720x1520 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4030 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 8.1 (Oreo); Funtouch 4.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 155.1×75.1×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 163 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)
- 6.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1520
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)
- 4030 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo Y91 (Mediatek), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) by 1568.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (91/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (94/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (57/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) (58/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) by 55 points (76/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) — 21/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo Y91 (Mediatek)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.